What Is Slow Food > Slow Food USA Blog > Top Chef takes on school lunch
Posted on Thu, June 24, 2010 by Intern
3 Comments | Categories: Film/TV/Radio, Policy, School Food,
by intern Christine Binder
When I heard that Sam Kass, White House assistant chef and Food Initiative Coordinator, was going to be the guest judge on Bravo TV’s Top Chef this week, I knew this would be a must-see episode. For those of you who didn’t tune in last night, let me give you a quick recap. No spoilers, I promise!
After creating some seriously tasty-looking “bipartisandwiches” for the Quickfire Challenge, the 16 contestants broke into four teams. For the Elimination Challenge, each team was charged with the task of cooking a delicious, nutritionally balanced lunch for 50 D.C. middle school students, a seemingly simple assignment, except for one major twist. Each team was only allotted a budget of $134, which comes to $2.68 per child, the federal reimbursement rate for school lunches. Chef Kass explained that because this money is used for labor and supplies in addition to ingredients, he would be subtracting $4 from their total budgets, leaving them with $130, which he described as a “major gift,” since schools usually only have roughly $1 to spend on ingredients.
As I expected, the chefs had a very difficult time adhering to this restrictive budget. At the Judge’s Table, one chef confessed, “We found ourselves at the cash register sacrificing creativity to keep substance in our meal.” The struggling teams also sacrificed nutrition, failing to include enough fruits and vegetables and “loading up with a lot of starch and sugar…the easy thing to do,” according to Kass.
Overall, I thought this was a great episode because it drove home two major points. First, cooking a healthy and delicious school lunch with a budget of $2.60 is a difficult challenge. Doing the same with only $1 for ingredients is much, much harder, which is why it’s so important for us to tell Congress to fully fund child nutrition programs.
Secondly, this challenge shows that chefs make excellent allies in the fight against childhood obesity. Their passion and creativity makes them uniquely able to show children that cooking and eating healthy foods are both cool and fun. This is exactly why Michelle Obama recently launched the “Chefs Move to Schools” program, part of her Let’s Move! campaign to solve the childhood obesity epidemic within a generation.
Even though only one chef could win the challenge, at the end of the day, the real winners were the kids, who genuinely enjoyed the chefs’ gourmet offerings. “Imagine if we had this every day for lunch,” one boy said to another. “That’d be cool.”
From meathouse on Sat, June 26, 2010
This topic is so important and I am glad to see that there are so many chefs getting out there and joining the battle for childhood obesity. As a elementary school teacher at a low income school here in SC I see this problem daily. We are doing our children disgrace with public school lunches. My students need to be introduced to healthy alternatives that provide them with the nutrition they need that they do not get from home. I hope to see change happen across this country soon!
From Cindy on Sat, June 26, 2010
I am so pleased to see that the subject of childhood obesity and school lunches is gaining momentum! It’s a very serious problem we can overcome!!!
From KitchenwareGuru on Sun, July 18, 2010
Uk Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver did exactly this for UK schools.
Got them off the high sugar, high fat processed foods that were standard offerings in the school canteens and got them using fresh ingredients.
There was massive resistance from the kitchen staff, students, parents and governments who find the school meals.
Luckily Jamie got the kids involved in the preparaion process and gradually won over staff.
He made an impact on the UK school dinner menu’s, so I hope that someone takes up the fight in the USA even if it is under the guise of reality TV, as this is an important challenge.
Childhood obesity and diabetes is now producing the first generation of kids that are expected to live shorter lives than thier parents. That’s just not right.