What Is Slow Food > Slow Food USA Blog > The Agriculture Gestapo
Posted on Mon, January 21, 2008 by Jerusha Klemperer
2 Comments | Categories: Farms and Farming, Meat, News, Current Events, Policy,
You have read, in this space among many others, of the sinister nature of genetic modification and the patenting of seeds. I have ranted endlessly about the dangers of the food system being in the hands of just a few corporate land barons. No reason to stop now.
For about five years now the USDA and many large corporate interests have been pushing a program called the National Animal Identification System. NAIS is touted as an effective tool in battling the spread of livestock diseases such as cattle tuberculosis and bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as mad cow. It provides methods for tagging livestock of any kind with RFID, the same sort of microchip that many people have put on their pets in hopes of recovering poor Fido if he ever gets lost. The thinking is that if a side of beef in a Greeley, Colorado meatpacking plant tests positive for mad cow, authorities can quickly and easily identify said cow, trace it back through the system, and discover other animals with which it may have made contact.
Currently, at the federal level, NAIS is a voluntary program overseen by the USDA and administered by the several states with help from organizations like the Future Farmers of America and the Farm Bureau. Farms, feedlots, and confined animal feeding operations apply for and receive a formal numerical designation that is then applied to microchips injected into or ear-tagged onto each animal. According to the USDA, in 2007 the state of Iowa went from 11,000 registered sites to more than 20,000, an increase of over 80 percent. All this despite a lack of any sort of government funding to participants for the program. Farmers must buy in if they choose to participate.
Setting aside for the moment that this system feels like a perfect bureaucratic method for closing the barn doors after the mad cows get out, all this seems fairly innocuous until we look a little deeper. The state of Texas has recently passed legislation requiring NAIS tagging for all dairy cattle. It goes into effect March 31. Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia and Tennessee now require participation for goats and sheep. In Michigan, farmer and now reluctant revolutionary Greg Niewendorp has endured visits from the sheriff reminiscent of scenes from and old Billy Jack movie.
The voluntary system is becoming perversely mandatory in many other states as well. In Colorado, according to Judith McGeary, Executive Director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, two families who refused to register their properties were kicked out of the state fair. In Idaho, the state included a NAIS premises registration form in the packets for registering one's brand (which has to be done every 5 years). The form was not clearly marked, and appeared to be simply part of the required brand documents. In Tennessee and North Carolina, where drought has made hay assistance necessary, you can't get any unless you register your property.
This has induced howls of outrage from a growing and vocal group of opponents, notably FarmAndRanchFreedom.org and NoNAIS.org, bringing together an odd-bedfellow mix of left-wing radicals and libertarian property-rights activists. They both feel that while such draconian measures may be necessary for an industrial food system that causes the very illnesses it now seems to need to track down, such procedures are overly-invasive, perhaps even Orwellian, for small family farms. The government is saying NAIS is voluntary while subsidiaries are making it mandatory. One needn't register one's guns, but goats are another matter. Seems we've met Big Brother, and he is us.
From bcomnes on Wed, January 23, 2008
This is a hard issue, but should be settled by the old greatest good for the greatest number test. Let’s face it, industrial food production practices are not going to go away in my lifetime, and if this technology enables rapid identification of other cows that might come from a BSE (mad cow) infected herd, so they can be culled out, then I think that the number of consumers that would be happy about reducing their prospects of exposure to a horribly fatal disease would more than offset the grumpiness of a smaller number of farmers who would like to be regulation free.
BTW cows do not get BSE from being near other cows, they get it from eating animal by-products (bone meal especially) derived from BSE - infected cows.
Also for an interesting discussion on whether BSE is transmitted through muscle tissue see http://www.organicconsumers.org/madcow/blank32702.cfm
From Mike Murphy on Thu, May 21, 2009
Let’s be clear. This is not about the “grumpiness of a smaller number of farmers that would like to be regulation free.” versus your ability to have safe food. If the USDA cared about safe food, why do they refuse to test or quarantine cattle coming in from Mexico known to have Bovine Turburculosis? When some beef producers want to do mad cow testing at their own expense to prove their herds are BSE free, why has the USDA refused to allow testing and actually threatened legal action if they do the testing? Surely, you would pay a little more to know your family was eating safe beef? Do some research on how many cattle Europe tested. The USDA won’t even allow it here. You have to ask, who benefits from that? The reason the USDA won’t allow it is because it would hurt big agribusinesses who would not be able to prove their meat was safe. Just like suing small dairies who put “hormone free” on their milk. If it is hormone free, or BSE free, we should be spending money to promote that, not threatening farmers for “unfair competition”, or spending hundreds of millions of our dollars on a regulation that their own documents admit is not about food safety. As each of their reasons for the program get shredded, they keep clinging to “the threat of foreign animal diseas outbreaks in this country is real”...Then do something at the borders now instead of bringing in diseased cattle every day, letting them comingle, then spending our money on trying to trace it after the fact. NAIS will not make you any safer, it is only to shore up export markets. Unfortunately, it will be at the expense of us grumpy small farmers whose only motivation is to sell healthy food to our neighbors. Luckily, not every consumer is buying their BS.
The more people learn about NAIS, which is a regulation, not a law, the more they are standing up against it. In Michigan, the Amish are suing over NAIS. They don?t get involved in legal action because they feel it is a use of force. If the Amish, who don?t fight, can stand up and fight this, we can put a stop to it. Even though it is not a law, it is expensive, so Congress needs to fund it. They have said they will not continue to fund it if they don?t see movement on it. Now is the time to add your voice to those speaking out against NAIS. The petition below will automtically notify your reps based on your zip code. Pleae forward it to as many people as possible.
http://www.petition2congress.com/2/1903/veterans-against-nais