Supporting Good, Clean, and Fair Food

The Slow Food USA Blog

Delicious Revolution: a Conservative Cause?

Posted on Thu, July 10, 2008 by Slow Food USA
4 Comments | Categories: Books, Farms and Farming,

Print Icon Print this Page Email Icon Send to a Friend
Bookmark and Share

by Slow Food USA staffer and blog editor, Jerusha Klemperer

Check out this thoughtful article from The American Conservative magazine. Its embrace of Slow Food may be surprising to some, but it's a welcome addition to the conversation.

It reminds me of a lunchtime visitor we had a few weeks ago, a farmer from South Carolina who noted that when it comes to Slow Food, conservatives and liberals may be on common ground. Everyone from homeschooling homesteaders to harvesting hippies can get behind good, clean food and the virtuous revival of sitting down together over a meal and appreciating its bounty.

Now some may flinch, like I did, when the author says that "life's inevitabilities don't warrant our shame," (when referring to Michael Pollan's shame that not everyone in this country has access to delicious food), and some may take issue, like I did, with his assertion that industrialized ag is just more productive than organic ag.* But it is interesting to see how true, traditional "conservatives" don't like the darn Farm Bill and its subsidies any more than the liberal democrats, and that they too would like to see a return to more mid-scale and regionally based food systems and economies.

Most delightful? The realization by an East Coaster like myself that in San Francisco, even the traditional conservatives have CSA shares, cook from The Art of Simple Food and quote Wendell Berry.

* Some may even want to share with him, say, Paul Roberts' The End of Food which explains quite clearly how those large yields end up producing diminishing returns after a few years.

PS: Also check out this interview from the same issue of American Conservative –Michael Pollan and Rod Dreher, the author of Crunchy Cons.


Member Comments

From bob on Fri, July 11, 2008

Please spread the word! It annoys me to no end when my fellow CSA members assume I want to listen to their Bush and Republican bashing because I get my tomatoes from the same place they do. 
I absolutely realize that local and slow food can be a political subject, but many blogs tend to direct most of their criticism at our Republican politicians, while the Democrats in charge of Congress almost two years now haven’t done much to help either.

From bcomnes on Fri, July 11, 2008

Hey Bob
Please spread the word!  It annoys me to no end when you use this blog to spread Republican talking points.  Take the advice of McCains’ economic adviser Phil Gramm when he says - stop whining!  Get a life, get your facts right (or are facts considered liberal bias?).  You need 60 votes to get a bill to the Senate floor, the Dems don’t have 60 (well at least not yet, wait til Obama’s coattails change that sad fact) .  That’s how the Republicans have thwarted the will of the 2006 Congress.
As for the article, I welcome the idea that slow food transcends political alignment, but it’s not surprising that a conservative author passes off low income people as life’s “inevitabilities”.  As for pimping for industrial food, that is totally within conservative character too.  Rationalizing big money and corporate privilege defines so much of what conservatives have to say. 
Why is it that conservatives label those who question industrial practices, proprietary seeds, and tomfoolery with the gene pool as food “kooks” but the “experts” (who could just as easily be referred to as industrial food “whores") get full page articles in the Chicago Tribune, NY Times, Washington Times without any transparency as to where their payhceck comes from? see http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/jun/15/repelling-the-killer-tomatoes/ for a good example of a Hoover Institute fellow shilling for Monsanto.
‘nuff said

From bob on Wed, July 16, 2008

So you’re telling me I missed the news about the Democrats holding committee hearings on how bad industrial is food is for us and our planet, proposing to eliminate subsidies on corporate farming, etc. etc., passing the House (no 60% requirement there!), but thwarted by the Senate Republicans from bringing them to floor for the final vote?
Wow, I must be really out of touch here in my red state ignorance. 
The fact is none of that ever happened.  The fact is both parties are wedded to the status quo when it comes to using taxpayer dollars to prop up the industrial food chain.  Maybe you’re too partisan to admit it, but I’m not, and I don’t think the people that run this website are either.

From Slow Food USA on Thu, July 17, 2008

You’re absolutely right, Bob, Democrats and Republicans alike were a huge disappointment in the end when it came to the Farm Bill, unfortunately!



Post Your Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Find Slow Food in your State